How is it that the progressive socialist liberal democrats can say things that are totally unfounded, with out merit or truth and yet are seen as legitimate spokespersons for the collective? Understand as well Krugman is just one of many that say things that make people that have common sense and live in the real world cannot begin to comprehend his meaning or logic.
It's rumored that mental professionals are watching him for signs of slipping over the edge.
Paul Krugman is a perfect example of just how far beyond the boundaries of the real world a true believer in the progressive socialist liberal agenda and ideology, where in his world, and that of millions of other individuals with diminished capacity like Mr Krugman, all one needs to have is only a small grasp of reality to be a member in good standing in the progressive collective.
This does answer one question which does explain why Hillary nearly won the November election.
But there is still a question that still remains and that is why is Mr Krugman considered a legitimate economist, or for that matter even have a platform like the New York Times as a political analyst to proclaim he has the answer to anything of substance? His decades long history as a progressive saying things that make no sense at all should have been enough to have him committed to mental professionals for examination.
But hey, not to worry, Mr Krugman is a good soldier and an even better democrat so he gets a free pass out of the rubber room. Little wonder the streets are not safe anymore.
 |
| Mr Krugman's history of saying things that alert mental health professionals. |
It's rumored that mental professionals are watching him for signs of slipping over the edge.
Paul Krugman is a perfect example of just how far beyond the boundaries of the real world a true believer in the progressive socialist liberal agenda and ideology, where in his world, and that of millions of other individuals with diminished capacity like Mr Krugman, all one needs to have is only a small grasp of reality to be a member in good standing in the progressive collective.
This does answer one question which does explain why Hillary nearly won the November election.
But there is still a question that still remains and that is why is Mr Krugman considered a legitimate economist, or for that matter even have a platform like the New York Times as a political analyst to proclaim he has the answer to anything of substance? His decades long history as a progressive saying things that make no sense at all should have been enough to have him committed to mental professionals for examination.
But hey, not to worry, Mr Krugman is a good soldier and an even better democrat so he gets a free pass out of the rubber room. Little wonder the streets are not safe anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment