Kyoto Protocol is hogwash and it always has been. It is just one more attempt to destroy capitalism in the West. This article is just the beginning of the end for ecoterrorists plans for control. They other means of attack, but at least this one is headed for the ash heap.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5309
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
Report on United Nations Accomplishments
I see the U.N. is back in the news with a report on how the member nations have supported the United States on issues that were important to us.
The report examined 12 key issues and found that only four nations supported the U.S. most of the time; Israel, Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands.
One of the key issues that these blood suckers wanted us to vote yes on but we said no to, was to lift the embargo on Cuba, the workers paradise, according to the liberal left and the neo-communists around the world. One of the other issues was forcing Israel to vacate the Palestinian territories.
Isn't it humorous that the biggest recipients of our aid vote against us all the time. These are just a few of the many that found it necessary to side with history rather than bank on the future.
Turkey gets over a billion dollars a year and they voted against us every time.
Ethiopia gets 594 million and they voted against us every time.
Colombia gets 524 million. Voting for us: 0
Egypt 460 million: 0
Jordan pockets 224 million but forgets who we are: 0
Peru sucks down 229 million and gives back the rigid digit: 0
Our friends, and I use that term very loosely, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and South Korea sided with the United States only 8 percent of the time.
The report also itemized some of the United Nations past accomplishments:
*The UN voted to remove it forces from Rwanda in the early days of the tribal conflict, and as a result, 900,000 Tutsis were slaughtered in 1994.
*The Iraqi people were screwed out of almost 2 billion dollars in the U.N.' food for oil' deal that saw Kofi's son Kojo reap hundreds of thousands dollars and nation's like France, Russia and China rake in hundreds of millions while tens of thousands of Iraqis were murdered.
*This one is just the best, the Sudan got elected to the Human Rights Commission while they turned a blind eye to the genocidal killing of nearly a hundred thousand Christian blacks by Islamic Sudanese terrorists in the region of Darfur.
*How about the UN peace keepers in the Congo that used food and money to force sex from the local girls and some as young as 12.
The United Nations is the world headquarters for terrorism and mass murder. It's single function is to coordinate and initiate attacks on anyone that might want the UN to actually function as a peace keeping organization. A majority of it's members represent the very worst that the world has to offer. Many of these member nation's think nothing of butchering their people as well as others for a few bucks and stash of good-time drugs.
How is it possible that the United States provides 22% of the entire budget of this ' murder for hire' organization and we are virtually the only ones that believes in equality and human rights.
The report examined 12 key issues and found that only four nations supported the U.S. most of the time; Israel, Palau, Micronesia and the Marshall Islands.
One of the key issues that these blood suckers wanted us to vote yes on but we said no to, was to lift the embargo on Cuba, the workers paradise, according to the liberal left and the neo-communists around the world. One of the other issues was forcing Israel to vacate the Palestinian territories.
Isn't it humorous that the biggest recipients of our aid vote against us all the time. These are just a few of the many that found it necessary to side with history rather than bank on the future.
Turkey gets over a billion dollars a year and they voted against us every time.
Ethiopia gets 594 million and they voted against us every time.
Colombia gets 524 million. Voting for us: 0
Egypt 460 million: 0
Jordan pockets 224 million but forgets who we are: 0
Peru sucks down 229 million and gives back the rigid digit: 0
Our friends, and I use that term very loosely, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and South Korea sided with the United States only 8 percent of the time.
The report also itemized some of the United Nations past accomplishments:
*The UN voted to remove it forces from Rwanda in the early days of the tribal conflict, and as a result, 900,000 Tutsis were slaughtered in 1994.
*The Iraqi people were screwed out of almost 2 billion dollars in the U.N.' food for oil' deal that saw Kofi's son Kojo reap hundreds of thousands dollars and nation's like France, Russia and China rake in hundreds of millions while tens of thousands of Iraqis were murdered.
*This one is just the best, the Sudan got elected to the Human Rights Commission while they turned a blind eye to the genocidal killing of nearly a hundred thousand Christian blacks by Islamic Sudanese terrorists in the region of Darfur.
*How about the UN peace keepers in the Congo that used food and money to force sex from the local girls and some as young as 12.
The United Nations is the world headquarters for terrorism and mass murder. It's single function is to coordinate and initiate attacks on anyone that might want the UN to actually function as a peace keeping organization. A majority of it's members represent the very worst that the world has to offer. Many of these member nation's think nothing of butchering their people as well as others for a few bucks and stash of good-time drugs.
How is it possible that the United States provides 22% of the entire budget of this ' murder for hire' organization and we are virtually the only ones that believes in equality and human rights.
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Liberal Media Bias on American Corporation
Sometimes I think I become too involved in what is going on in the world of information. Maybe I am beginning to see things that aren't there. There are things in the media, think liberals here, that I don't need proof of as they stand out for everyone to see that have a once of perception, especially politics, but what about media bias when it come to American corporations.
Does the media hate American corporations like they hate the American military? How about the media hate for Christians? Jews? Capitalism? Cars? Whoa!
What prompted this was a report that I saw last night on my local TV news cast concerning the latest crash tests on automobiles by the Insurance Institute for Highway safety. (IIHS) The report was the "Top safety Picks for 2006".
Also the morning edition of the local paper had headlines on the financial page showing how an American manufacture had the lowest rated car in the midsized moderately priced cars. The crash test that dropped this vehicle into the pits was the rating for side impacts.
I have been around and worked on cars all my life. I have repaired car engines from the bottom up, done body work and electrical repairs as well as spray painting of completely reworked cars. I think that I have a feel for automobiles and how they should perform under most circumstances.
Does the media hate American corporations like they hate the American military? How about the media hate for Christians? Jews? Capitalism? Cars? Whoa!
What prompted this was a report that I saw last night on my local TV news cast concerning the latest crash tests on automobiles by the Insurance Institute for Highway safety. (IIHS) The report was the "Top safety Picks for 2006".
Also the morning edition of the local paper had headlines on the financial page showing how an American manufacture had the lowest rated car in the midsized moderately priced cars. The crash test that dropped this vehicle into the pits was the rating for side impacts.
I have been around and worked on cars all my life. I have repaired car engines from the bottom up, done body work and electrical repairs as well as spray painting of completely reworked cars. I think that I have a feel for automobiles and how they should perform under most circumstances.
What I don't understand is how one manufacture in this country has the honor of being the most celebrated for failure. I see it car magazines as well. If there is one manufacture that is going to be criticize above all others, it will be FORD.
If Ford has a recall, you can bet it will make news. The papers and TV will have automotive reports on how death is just around the corner for you if you have one of these bad cars. And it seems that no matter how trivial the problem is, the media makes it out to life threatening.
I refuse to believe that Ford is the only one that has problems. I remember General Motors had a recall that made the papers. Other than this, I can not remember when I have heard of another car manufacture having a recall, other than Ford.
Is it possible that Honda and Toyota have never had a recall where they have had to send out letters to millions of owners to bring in their cars for rework? What about Chrysler? Oh, sorry, they are owned by the Germans now so they have automatically come off the media hit list.
Funny thing, I just got a letter to bring in my Chrysler minivan to have the rear heat vents reworked and before that the front suspension. I don't remember seeing that in the papers, but Ford had to bring in thousands of police cars as their dash boards were collapsing under the weight of all that equipment that they have stacked on it. That made national news including a class action law suit form police departments.
The car magazines joined in on this one as well. Their comment was that Ford just doesn't give the public what they want, quality and reliability. Really? I believe it's just their critical opinion of anything American.
Given all this history, I wondered why the Institute decided to high-light this one particular division of cars, the midsized moderately priced. hmmmm Maybe it wasn't the Highway safety people at all, maybe it was an enterprising journalist that saw an opportunity to take it to an American manufacture, Ford, and their newest car, the Fusion. What a great opportunity to kick Ford as their financial picture at this time is not good.
The main thrust of the news was the safety for side impacts. Here again, the media decided to edit the list just a little - according to IIHS, the top pick was the Saab 9-3 , gold rating, and the Subaru Legacy also got a gold rating.
But what cars did the media decide to talk about, the Lexus and BMW 3 Series. They both rated sliver and 5th and 7th, respectively. Also, these top rated car all had side air bags as options or came as standard equipment. They never mentioned the four top picks in this category. I don't get it?
True, the Fusion didn't perform well, no side air bags this year, but there were many others that were just as bad but weren't mentioned at all, just Ford made into the headlines.
Something else that the media failed to mention is in the large car division as Top Picks for 2006, the two gold rated cars were Ford products, the Five Hundred and the Mercury Montego. There was only one other rated car in this entire class and this was the Audi A6, rated silver.
Am I out of bounds here? Am I getting a little paranoid? It just seems that Ford gets a lot of unfair air time while the other more favored, more politically correct manufactures get a pass.
Monday, March 06, 2006
Katrina Explained - Again
Got questions about Katrina? Read this all the way through - this is fantastic!!
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5302
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5302
Al Frankin and The Oscars
I didn't watch the Oscars last night mainly because I don't care that much about the Hollywood liberals that seem to dominate the 'kook' left ideology. Best picture, 'Crash'; never heard of it! I did find out that it grossed 35 million - -!? - I know, so what, that's chicken feed.
Anyway, I don't have much time tonight as I'm going to watch "24" at 7 p.m. A two hour episode of 24 is just a plain nerve racking experience. The show is great, but the real nerve racking comes in when you have to wade through all of the damn commercials.
Oh, and how about this, Al Frankin is losing his New York station at the end of this month. Air America is going into the tank. I feel so bad for the liberals that they just don't have anything to say that anyone wants to hear. heh
Anyway, I don't have much time tonight as I'm going to watch "24" at 7 p.m. A two hour episode of 24 is just a plain nerve racking experience. The show is great, but the real nerve racking comes in when you have to wade through all of the damn commercials.
Oh, and how about this, Al Frankin is losing his New York station at the end of this month. Air America is going into the tank. I feel so bad for the liberals that they just don't have anything to say that anyone wants to hear. heh
Sunday, March 05, 2006
The Democrats lose Their Party
Upon reflection, the story from Minnesota, concerning the Democratic Party and the Progress for America ads that have been running for the last several weeks on radio that relates good news about Iraq, is perhaps the most remarkable story to have ever taken place.
It's a story about the most pure form of hypocrisy to ever descend upon a public that lives in a world dominated by a group of professionals that make a living out of perpetuating falsehoods and deceit.
Professional politicians that grasp at the smallest tid-bit of information and turn it into revelations of misconduct and treachery, twisting the information to meet their agenda, or if that doesn't work, they use bold faces lies.
The national media and the politicians are partners in this crime against America and the Constitution itself.
When the Progress for America starting running the ads that related stories of successes in Iraq and first person testimonials from wives and mothers of men that were killed in combat, the Minnesota Democratic Party flew into a rage. They demanded that these ads be removed from the air because they were untrue. They went so far as to try legally to have them removed.
The first amendment of the constitution that guarantees free speech doesn't apply unless you say what is thought to be the truth by those that are far smarter they anyone else. They demand that you do what you are told.
Confronted by someone that has an idea, and has the audacity to actually follow through on it, sends liberals into uncontrollable rage. The Democrats in Minnesota are the best example, but one can find them just about anywhere else for that matter.
Just take a minute now and digest this. The Democrats ranting about someone not telling the truth. You can't make this stuff up! I have to sit down when I think about this because the concept is so difficult that my small brain starts spinning, trying to resolve the contradiction. I don't think it's possible.
That a political party would take a stand, in national media outlet, The Minneapolis Star Tribune, demanding that freedom of speech wasn't for everyone, needs to step back and reevaluate it's core values. I believe if the Democratic Party would actually do that, they would find the cupboard bare.
They would find that the Democratic Party is no longer the party that represented the blue collar workers of America, that it ever did is up for grabs, but it is now the far left liberal party based on eastern socialism which dictates all workers of the world must be equal, no one can have more than someone else. Corporations must be reduced to tools of the state. Capitalism will be a thing of the past as it is unfair and wasteful. The constitution of the United States of America will be dissolved as unworkable.
If anyone needs proof of this transformation they only need to listen to the Democrats in the United State Senate, or the major newspapers and television networks.
If the liberals are successful in transforming the Democratic party, and succeed in gaining a majority in the government, the results will catastrophic for all of us.
There will be some exceptions to these hard and fast rules once they gain power, of course, like the party members that have to make sure we all obey the laws of the land. Someone has to live in the big houses and drive the best cars and wear the finest cloths. Someone has to decide who you will be. Someone has to decide who lives and who dies.
Superior intelligence deserves rewards.
After all, they are the ones that figured out how to steal all of your money and individual rights, why shouldn't they have all of the power. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Think that sound a little harsh? Maybe. Maybe not. It will be up to all of us to watch and listen to what goes on in our government, and then decide what is the truth and what is spin in the media.
As the saying goes, "For tyranny and treachery to succeed, all it takes is for good people to do nothing".
It's a story about the most pure form of hypocrisy to ever descend upon a public that lives in a world dominated by a group of professionals that make a living out of perpetuating falsehoods and deceit.
Professional politicians that grasp at the smallest tid-bit of information and turn it into revelations of misconduct and treachery, twisting the information to meet their agenda, or if that doesn't work, they use bold faces lies.
The national media and the politicians are partners in this crime against America and the Constitution itself.
When the Progress for America starting running the ads that related stories of successes in Iraq and first person testimonials from wives and mothers of men that were killed in combat, the Minnesota Democratic Party flew into a rage. They demanded that these ads be removed from the air because they were untrue. They went so far as to try legally to have them removed.
The first amendment of the constitution that guarantees free speech doesn't apply unless you say what is thought to be the truth by those that are far smarter they anyone else. They demand that you do what you are told.
Confronted by someone that has an idea, and has the audacity to actually follow through on it, sends liberals into uncontrollable rage. The Democrats in Minnesota are the best example, but one can find them just about anywhere else for that matter.
Just take a minute now and digest this. The Democrats ranting about someone not telling the truth. You can't make this stuff up! I have to sit down when I think about this because the concept is so difficult that my small brain starts spinning, trying to resolve the contradiction. I don't think it's possible.
That a political party would take a stand, in national media outlet, The Minneapolis Star Tribune, demanding that freedom of speech wasn't for everyone, needs to step back and reevaluate it's core values. I believe if the Democratic Party would actually do that, they would find the cupboard bare.
They would find that the Democratic Party is no longer the party that represented the blue collar workers of America, that it ever did is up for grabs, but it is now the far left liberal party based on eastern socialism which dictates all workers of the world must be equal, no one can have more than someone else. Corporations must be reduced to tools of the state. Capitalism will be a thing of the past as it is unfair and wasteful. The constitution of the United States of America will be dissolved as unworkable.
If anyone needs proof of this transformation they only need to listen to the Democrats in the United State Senate, or the major newspapers and television networks.
If the liberals are successful in transforming the Democratic party, and succeed in gaining a majority in the government, the results will catastrophic for all of us.
There will be some exceptions to these hard and fast rules once they gain power, of course, like the party members that have to make sure we all obey the laws of the land. Someone has to live in the big houses and drive the best cars and wear the finest cloths. Someone has to decide who you will be. Someone has to decide who lives and who dies.
Superior intelligence deserves rewards.
After all, they are the ones that figured out how to steal all of your money and individual rights, why shouldn't they have all of the power. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Think that sound a little harsh? Maybe. Maybe not. It will be up to all of us to watch and listen to what goes on in our government, and then decide what is the truth and what is spin in the media.
As the saying goes, "For tyranny and treachery to succeed, all it takes is for good people to do nothing".
Saturday, March 04, 2006
Okay Enough Winter Already
I guess it's that time of year when I start having those visions of what went before - Although the winter this year has been okay, as far as winters go, I still get that certain longing for the warm weather, sipping coffee on the porch at 6 a.m. while the sun is just starting to come up over the trees across the pond, and the breeze out of southwest is cool and oh, so refreshing. I just love it!
Well, I guess it's just one of those things that will happen no matter what, and any and all whining that I do won't make it happen any faster - sigh -
Friday, March 03, 2006
Liberals Still Spinning Katrina
As predicted, the media and the intellectually challenged Democrats smell blood on the water of this katrina tape thing with President Bush discussing the levees before, and after the storm.
When you view the tapes there's nothing there to cause such a rush to cut someone's throat. It's just another chance for the liberals to try and discredit or destroy the President.
The tape that shows Gov. Blanco of Louisiana assuring President Bush that she believes the levees are okay, when in fact they weren't, hasn't made the evening news. 'Let's not look at all of the tapes, we just want to highlight the parts that we can spin to our advantage'. Go figure!
Do these tapes reveal anything new that hasn't been discussed before? No. Do we know that the federal government needs to reorganize FEMA to be able to handle catastrophe disaster? Yes.
I still find it interesting that when the congressional hearings were held on what happened along the coast and what all levels of government have to do to come up to speed, the governors of Alabama, Mississippi, Florida and Texas all said they had no problem with FEMA. Where is Louisiana in this report? Sorry, don't you know, it's not there fault. they're Democrats - we can't expect them to take care of themselves.
According to the rules that the governors stated in the hearing, the individual states are responsible for their own recovery for the first 72 hours. Governor Bush said he has never had a problem with FEMA, and who else would know how FEMA works better than the governor of a state that has more natural disasters than other state?
Louisiana, of course, was a complete disaster - the problem was, and is, 60 years of the Democrats running the show. Billions that were spent on the area to improve the levees was some how misplaced. Well dah! Blanco and Nagin have no clue why their state government, at all levels, is totally incompetent. Talk about a cult of corruption! Hey, chill-out - cut them some slack - they're Democrats.
Ray Nagin, in typical form, is pulling out all the stops now to shift the blame for his total incompetence in not implementing the emergency disaster evacuation plan that would have saved hundreds of lives, to the failure of the federal government. He feels he can hide behind the liberal press that, up to now, has given him and Blanco a pass on the disaster. Liberals cover for each other. It's part of the criminal code of honor.
Remember the pirate philosophy and see if there is any similarities to Louisiana and the liberal Democrats. I think it's a perfect fit.
When you view the tapes there's nothing there to cause such a rush to cut someone's throat. It's just another chance for the liberals to try and discredit or destroy the President.
The tape that shows Gov. Blanco of Louisiana assuring President Bush that she believes the levees are okay, when in fact they weren't, hasn't made the evening news. 'Let's not look at all of the tapes, we just want to highlight the parts that we can spin to our advantage'. Go figure!
Do these tapes reveal anything new that hasn't been discussed before? No. Do we know that the federal government needs to reorganize FEMA to be able to handle catastrophe disaster? Yes.
I still find it interesting that when the congressional hearings were held on what happened along the coast and what all levels of government have to do to come up to speed, the governors of Alabama, Mississippi, Florida and Texas all said they had no problem with FEMA. Where is Louisiana in this report? Sorry, don't you know, it's not there fault. they're Democrats - we can't expect them to take care of themselves.
According to the rules that the governors stated in the hearing, the individual states are responsible for their own recovery for the first 72 hours. Governor Bush said he has never had a problem with FEMA, and who else would know how FEMA works better than the governor of a state that has more natural disasters than other state?
Louisiana, of course, was a complete disaster - the problem was, and is, 60 years of the Democrats running the show. Billions that were spent on the area to improve the levees was some how misplaced. Well dah! Blanco and Nagin have no clue why their state government, at all levels, is totally incompetent. Talk about a cult of corruption! Hey, chill-out - cut them some slack - they're Democrats.
Ray Nagin, in typical form, is pulling out all the stops now to shift the blame for his total incompetence in not implementing the emergency disaster evacuation plan that would have saved hundreds of lives, to the failure of the federal government. He feels he can hide behind the liberal press that, up to now, has given him and Blanco a pass on the disaster. Liberals cover for each other. It's part of the criminal code of honor.
Remember the pirate philosophy and see if there is any similarities to Louisiana and the liberal Democrats. I think it's a perfect fit.
Thursday, March 02, 2006
The Media Twists and Turns
The liberal never say die - this latest flap about the levees is just one more attempt by the puppet masters to make the Democrats look stupid while trying to crush the elected government of this country.
What actually is going on? The left of center media has a tape of a meeting that took place a few days before Katrina hit New Orleans. In the tape, someone asked the president what he thought would happen when the water "over-topped" the levees. He answered something to the effect that is was a grave situation and that FEMA would do be there to assist the local officials.
As we all know, FEMA was not prepared to handle the consequence's of such a catastrophe as a category 4 hurricane, and one that would eventually breach the levees and destroy almost the whole city.
The media is just spinning this video tape to make trouble for George Bush. First, the tape wasn't leaked like they said, the Bush administration gave it to the media back in August of last year and secondly, the media is in full flight on the smallest one word part of the tape. The reporter asked about the "over-topping" of the levees and when asked about the levees when they broke four days after the strom, Bush said he didn't know that they wouldn't hold.
Here comes the line that the press can't hold back on, it's their favorite, "Bush lied". The key here is, of course, is that he was asked about the water 'over-flowing' into the city, nobody asked about a breach. Big difference. But the media decided to change that little part for dramatic effect when they went public yesterday. The antique media thought the stupid public wouldn't pick up on this little change.
They had the tape all this time but decided back then it was of no use. It was a straight forward news conference. Someone must have been reviewing tapes looking for something they could use and saw an opportunity to twist the truth a little and hammer the government with the lie.
What a bunch of losers.
See how the pirates attack the big vessels hoping to inflect enough damage to come along side and board her in the smoke. This time, as in the past, they aren't strong enough, but that could change. The ship of state has to always be well armed, and make sure her powder is dry or we will all be chained to the oars.
What actually is going on? The left of center media has a tape of a meeting that took place a few days before Katrina hit New Orleans. In the tape, someone asked the president what he thought would happen when the water "over-topped" the levees. He answered something to the effect that is was a grave situation and that FEMA would do be there to assist the local officials.
As we all know, FEMA was not prepared to handle the consequence's of such a catastrophe as a category 4 hurricane, and one that would eventually breach the levees and destroy almost the whole city.
The media is just spinning this video tape to make trouble for George Bush. First, the tape wasn't leaked like they said, the Bush administration gave it to the media back in August of last year and secondly, the media is in full flight on the smallest one word part of the tape. The reporter asked about the "over-topping" of the levees and when asked about the levees when they broke four days after the strom, Bush said he didn't know that they wouldn't hold.
Here comes the line that the press can't hold back on, it's their favorite, "Bush lied". The key here is, of course, is that he was asked about the water 'over-flowing' into the city, nobody asked about a breach. Big difference. But the media decided to change that little part for dramatic effect when they went public yesterday. The antique media thought the stupid public wouldn't pick up on this little change.
They had the tape all this time but decided back then it was of no use. It was a straight forward news conference. Someone must have been reviewing tapes looking for something they could use and saw an opportunity to twist the truth a little and hammer the government with the lie.
What a bunch of losers.
See how the pirates attack the big vessels hoping to inflect enough damage to come along side and board her in the smoke. This time, as in the past, they aren't strong enough, but that could change. The ship of state has to always be well armed, and make sure her powder is dry or we will all be chained to the oars.
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Pirates and Liberal Democrats
I really liked that book, The Pirate Hunter, that I tried to compress for you yesterday. I truly hope I did it justice and tantalized someone enough to go out and pick it up at the library.
like I said yesterday, I have asked so many people who they thought Captain Kidd was and they all knew. He's a pirate. A pirate? Sure, they're the guys that go out and steal, destroy and plunder other people's stuff and then run and hide. Then I say, Whoa - you have it all wrong, what you're describing is a liberal Democrat, not Captain Kidd.
Think about it - how do the Democrats compare to the pirates of the 18th century? The old time pirates were a plague to the commerce of the day. They would lie in wait along the shipping lanes and then run down the slower trader vessel, board her, take what ever they thought they could sell or consume, savage the women and then leave to parts unknown.
The similarities between the modern day liberal Democrat and the pirates of old is uncanny. The new Democratic pirate is always just waiting to attack the big successful vessel carrying all of the goods that make the system run. They try to take the best of what's on the ship of states' agenda, savage the parts that don't help them to get back into power and wealth, and then run and hide behind the skirts of the news media that will lie about what actually happened.
The media does this because they get some of the booty as a kick back. It's called 'influence on the quarter deck'. Now when another opportunity arises to attack another prosperous vessel, the liberal Democrat can steal and savage to their hearts content and the average Joe and Jane will be none the wiser until it's too late.
It isn't difficult to see what will happen after a lot of the ships of state are savaged by the cut-throat liberal Democrat pirates, the source of the ships will go broke because they could never reach their destination, and the buyer and consumer at the end of the line, never gets enough product to sustain them.
The result is both the supplier and consumer parish. Now is the time that the liberal Democrat pirate will attack the home base and pick there bones clean. The pirate or the liberal doesn't care about production of goods or taking responsibility for the security of the town and it's people, they are only concerned with taking anything of value that is produced by the hard work of others
They have no plan for the future. The pirate philosophy is to take and destroy. Their life is centered on the accumulation of wealth and power. Once they have enough money and power, they will attack the biggest ship they can find and use it to plunder the entire world of it's best resources. Everyone will be at the beckon call of the pirates. As in the old days, the pirates will force the conquered populations to work for nothing so the pirates can live like kings.
The problems started when the ship of state started to sink from neglect and abuse. The work force that drove the oars to move the ship started to age and die off, while the source of more workers in distant lands diminished, as they armed themselves to defend their population from the pirate scourge. The result was a total collapse.
The liberal pirates quickly gathered up what booty they could and fled from those that wanted justice, disguising themselves as common people so as to hide from retribution. With their booty, they still lived the good life.
Now all they have to do is wait until they see another new big fat productive vessel being built and sail for distant lands. As before, they will hide and wait so they can begin their destructive cycle all over again.
like I said yesterday, I have asked so many people who they thought Captain Kidd was and they all knew. He's a pirate. A pirate? Sure, they're the guys that go out and steal, destroy and plunder other people's stuff and then run and hide. Then I say, Whoa - you have it all wrong, what you're describing is a liberal Democrat, not Captain Kidd.
Think about it - how do the Democrats compare to the pirates of the 18th century? The old time pirates were a plague to the commerce of the day. They would lie in wait along the shipping lanes and then run down the slower trader vessel, board her, take what ever they thought they could sell or consume, savage the women and then leave to parts unknown.
The similarities between the modern day liberal Democrat and the pirates of old is uncanny. The new Democratic pirate is always just waiting to attack the big successful vessel carrying all of the goods that make the system run. They try to take the best of what's on the ship of states' agenda, savage the parts that don't help them to get back into power and wealth, and then run and hide behind the skirts of the news media that will lie about what actually happened.
The media does this because they get some of the booty as a kick back. It's called 'influence on the quarter deck'. Now when another opportunity arises to attack another prosperous vessel, the liberal Democrat can steal and savage to their hearts content and the average Joe and Jane will be none the wiser until it's too late.
It isn't difficult to see what will happen after a lot of the ships of state are savaged by the cut-throat liberal Democrat pirates, the source of the ships will go broke because they could never reach their destination, and the buyer and consumer at the end of the line, never gets enough product to sustain them.
The result is both the supplier and consumer parish. Now is the time that the liberal Democrat pirate will attack the home base and pick there bones clean. The pirate or the liberal doesn't care about production of goods or taking responsibility for the security of the town and it's people, they are only concerned with taking anything of value that is produced by the hard work of others
They have no plan for the future. The pirate philosophy is to take and destroy. Their life is centered on the accumulation of wealth and power. Once they have enough money and power, they will attack the biggest ship they can find and use it to plunder the entire world of it's best resources. Everyone will be at the beckon call of the pirates. As in the old days, the pirates will force the conquered populations to work for nothing so the pirates can live like kings.
The problems started when the ship of state started to sink from neglect and abuse. The work force that drove the oars to move the ship started to age and die off, while the source of more workers in distant lands diminished, as they armed themselves to defend their population from the pirate scourge. The result was a total collapse.
The liberal pirates quickly gathered up what booty they could and fled from those that wanted justice, disguising themselves as common people so as to hide from retribution. With their booty, they still lived the good life.
Now all they have to do is wait until they see another new big fat productive vessel being built and sail for distant lands. As before, they will hide and wait so they can begin their destructive cycle all over again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
