The motto by the progressive democrats is a workable one for them as they have employed it for decades, 'by any means necessary' to accomplish the agenda and ideology of progressive socialist liberalism.
But the main question that remains is why did the progressives single out this attack on Attkisson's computer? What did she have on them or their associates in multiple federal agencies and departments controlled by progressive democrats that would motivate them more criminal activity?
Why an all out attack on her from so many different agencies, even the Post Office? Is this a forerunner of the the progressive socialist liberal democrats they are now attacking the Republicans and president Trump and also what they did with the IRS, DOJ, the FBI and others that coordinated attacks on Conservative groups before the 2012 elections?
What’s New in My Lawsuit Against the Government for Breaking Into My Computer
Sharyl Attkisson / @SharylAttkisson /
I’m frequently asked about the status of my lawsuit against the Justice Department over secret, unlawful intrusions into my computers, exposed in 2013. While the case is moving slowly through the federal court system, there is a new development:
Ongoing forensic work has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyberattacks on my computer laptop system. Those IP addresses don’t belong there.
In a new affidavit filed last week, cybersecurity expert David Scantling said:
Scantling served as a contractor for the National Security Agency and the CIA, and as a Department of Defense civilian employee. He is familiar with Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) cyberattacks.
In fact, he developed and deployed similar APT cyberattacks against foreign government, commercial, insurgent, and terrorist targets. He also developed and deployed cybersecurity countermeasures in the private sector to defend against such attacks.
Interestingly, both government IP addresses found embedded deep in my computer system trace to the U.S. Postal Service, which has been known to cooperate with intelligence agencies on various levels. The Postal Service refused to cooperate with me, prior to my lawsuit, after my forensics expert recovered evidence of an IP address mysteriously residing in my computer.
At the time, an agency official dismissed the forensics evidence as some sort of unexplainable mistake, and refused to help us learn how its IP addresses are maintained and accessed so we could identify the perpetrators.
Tracing the evidence of the government-related intrusion to individual participants hasn’t been easy.
The attackers attempted to erase their tracks once they were discovered. And neither the Postal Service nor the Justice Department are voluntarily cooperating. But experts familiar with the tools and tradecraft that are proprietary to government intelligence agencies painstakingly have recovered and pieced together compelling forensic proof.
Scantling said in the affidavit filed last week:
Read the rest of Sharyl Attkisson’s update here.
But the main question that remains is why did the progressives single out this attack on Attkisson's computer? What did she have on them or their associates in multiple federal agencies and departments controlled by progressive democrats that would motivate them more criminal activity?
Why an all out attack on her from so many different agencies, even the Post Office? Is this a forerunner of the the progressive socialist liberal democrats they are now attacking the Republicans and president Trump and also what they did with the IRS, DOJ, the FBI and others that coordinated attacks on Conservative groups before the 2012 elections?
The next logical question to be asked, what criminal activity are the progressive democrats involved in as we speak? Robert Mueller maybe?
What’s New in My Lawsuit Against the Government for Breaking Into My Computer
Sharyl Attkisson / @SharylAttkisson /
I’m frequently asked about the status of my lawsuit against the Justice Department over secret, unlawful intrusions into my computers, exposed in 2013. While the case is moving slowly through the federal court system, there is a new development:
Ongoing forensic work has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyberattacks on my computer laptop system. Those IP addresses don’t belong there.
In a new affidavit filed last week, cybersecurity expert David Scantling said:
The presence of these USPS [Postal Service] addresses on [Attkisson’s] computer is not a mistake; it is not a random event; and it is not technically possible for these IP addresses to simply appear on her computer systems without activity by someone using them as part of the cyberattack.
Scantling served as a contractor for the National Security Agency and the CIA, and as a Department of Defense civilian employee. He is familiar with Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) cyberattacks.
In fact, he developed and deployed similar APT cyberattacks against foreign government, commercial, insurgent, and terrorist targets. He also developed and deployed cybersecurity countermeasures in the private sector to defend against such attacks.
Interestingly, both government IP addresses found embedded deep in my computer system trace to the U.S. Postal Service, which has been known to cooperate with intelligence agencies on various levels. The Postal Service refused to cooperate with me, prior to my lawsuit, after my forensics expert recovered evidence of an IP address mysteriously residing in my computer.
At the time, an agency official dismissed the forensics evidence as some sort of unexplainable mistake, and refused to help us learn how its IP addresses are maintained and accessed so we could identify the perpetrators.
Tracing the evidence of the government-related intrusion to individual participants hasn’t been easy.
The attackers attempted to erase their tracks once they were discovered. And neither the Postal Service nor the Justice Department are voluntarily cooperating. But experts familiar with the tools and tradecraft that are proprietary to government intelligence agencies painstakingly have recovered and pieced together compelling forensic proof.
Scantling said in the affidavit filed last week:
There can be no reasonable question that an APT [Advanced Persistent Threat]-style cyberattack was carried out on Attkisson’s computer systems and internet connection. Specifically, the APT methods deployed against [Attkisson’s] computers and internet connection … were sophisticated and of the type only available to government-type activities and operations.This latest information builds upon earlier forensic examinations already conducted by: a confidential government-linked source, an independent forensics specialist hired by my former employer CBS News, and a forensics expert consulting on my lawsuit.
Read the rest of Sharyl Attkisson’s update here.
No comments:
Post a Comment