Interesting understanding here between the ''left'' and progressive liberal democrats in congress and our society. I can't call it a ''civil'' society any longer as the liberals have taken that aspect of our 'civil' discourse away and replaced it with a bastardized form of the first amendment where free speech is what the liberals say it has to be.
To say the liberal democrats is not part of the ''left'' is naïve if not dangerous to our way of life.
It does seem strange, Mr Prager, that if the left is not liberal as you say, why is it the there is no push back from any quarter of prominent liberals against the insanity coming from the liberal left media, nearly all letter channels on television, many if not all printed news outlets, and of course most universities. And then there's the members of congress in Washington on the 'left' side of the aisle, let alone many at the state level that believe the attempted killing of Republicans by a admitted progressive liberal democrat was no big deal. It is believed this man was deranged, but how did he get that way?
National liberal rhetoric? Liberals aren't leftists?
Where was the outrage from liberals that their discourse might be found to be in sighting someone to kill. Who stood up and condemn this tactic that is designed to destroy the opposition 'by any means necessary' other then the admitted socialist Bernie Sanders.
What about the ''leftist'' lunatic liberal ravings from Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters, among others especially in the Hollywood community that condemn on a daily basis anything that resembles America's ''civil'' society. Their condemnation is based on the belief that the Constitution is of no value any longer as it was written by white people that were salve holders.
It's nonsense to believe there's a difference between leftists and liberals. It's just a matter of degree.
The Latest Proof That the Left Opposes Western Civilization
Dennis Prager / @DennisPrager /
Last week, The Atlantic rendered a great service to those of us who contend that America is in the midst of a civil war between the right and the left. It provided a smoking gun—actually, the gunshot itself—to those of us who contend that the left (never to be confused with liberals) is intent on dismantling Western civilization.
It published articles by two left-wing writers, one by Peter Beinart titled “The Racial and Religious Paranoia of Trump’s Warsaw Speech,” and one by its national correspondent, James Fallows, written on the same theme as Beinart’s. The subject of both articles was President Donald Trump’s speech in Warsaw, Poland, last week, a speech described by The Wall Street Journal as “a determined and affirmative defense of the Western tradition.”
Yet, to The Atlantic writers, defending Western civilization is nothing more than a defense of white racism. Beinart begins his piece saying: “In his speech in Poland on Thursday, Donald Trump referred 10 times to ‘the West’ and five times to ‘our civilization.’ His white nationalist supporters will understand exactly what he means. It’s important that other Americans do, too.”
And Fallows begins saying, “what he called ‘civilization’ … boils down to ties of ethnicity and blood.” Is there one liberal or conservative American who thinks that the words “the West” and “Western civilization” mean a celebration of white-blood purity? I doubt it.
What we have here are two vital lessons. One is that leftism is the primary racist ideology of our time, seeing everything in terms of race, whereas mainstream liberalism and conservatism advocate a race-blind society as manifest in Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “content of his character” line. The left disdains this view.
To cite one of innumerable examples, the University of California has published a list of biased “microaggression” statements students and faculty are to avoid. One of them is “There is only one race, the human race.” In other words, the left, which controls our universities, teaches American students that it is wrong to believe in one human race. That was precisely what the Nazis taught German students. And now, we have another expression of this doctrine enunciated in the pages of The Atlantic: that those who wish to protect or save Western civilization are talking about saving the white race.
I am certainly not equating leftism with Nazism. The left doesn’t seek to annihilate all Jews (it merely supports the Palestinians, who seek to annihilate the Jewish state).
I am merely stating an unassailable truth: No significant political movement since the Nazis has “honored” race or equated Western civilization with race, as Beinart and Fallows do.
The second service provided by The Atlantic writers is proof that the left loathes Western civilization and therefore has become the internal enemy of Western civilization both in America and Europe.
In the left’s eyes, the mere suggestion that Western civilization needs to be saved is, by definition, a call for the preservation of the white race. Therefore, the left opposes calls to save Western civilization. As Beinart wrote:
We didn’t need Beinart and Fallows—we already had innumerable examples, such as the University of Pennsylvania English Department removing its longstanding poster of William Shakespeare because he was a white male—but in their explicit articulation of the left’s view, they are immensely helpful.
Shakespeare is read in every language that has an alphabet not because he was white or European but because he is regarded as the greatest playwright who ever lived. But the leftists who run that English Department place race (and gender) above excellence—a thorough rejection of Western values.
Ironically, outside of liberals and conservatives, those most likely to celebrate Western values are likely to not be Western.
The Japanese would scoff at the idea that Bach and Beethoven did not write the greatest music ever composed. That is why some of the greatest Bach recordings of our time come from Japanese musicians living in Japan. Nor would the Japanese deny that their modern country’s democratic values come from the West.
The West’s disdain for its own values seems to be getting increasingly strident with each passing day. Trump is making an important and laudable effort to reverse this trend. He’s walking in good company.
In an address to the Pan-American Scientific Congress in Washington, D.C., on May 10, 1940, then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “Americans might have to become the guardian of Western culture, the protector of Christian civilization.” FDR frequently spoke about protecting both Western and Christian civilization.
We owe a debt of gratitude to The Atlantic, CNN (whose senior White House correspondent, Jeff Zeleny, described Trump’s address as a “white America, America first kind of speech”), and others.
They have made it clear that the left has contempt for Western civilization and therefore constitutes the greatest threat to its survival.
To say the liberal democrats is not part of the ''left'' is naïve if not dangerous to our way of life.
It does seem strange, Mr Prager, that if the left is not liberal as you say, why is it the there is no push back from any quarter of prominent liberals against the insanity coming from the liberal left media, nearly all letter channels on television, many if not all printed news outlets, and of course most universities. And then there's the members of congress in Washington on the 'left' side of the aisle, let alone many at the state level that believe the attempted killing of Republicans by a admitted progressive liberal democrat was no big deal. It is believed this man was deranged, but how did he get that way?
National liberal rhetoric? Liberals aren't leftists?
Where was the outrage from liberals that their discourse might be found to be in sighting someone to kill. Who stood up and condemn this tactic that is designed to destroy the opposition 'by any means necessary' other then the admitted socialist Bernie Sanders.
What about the ''leftist'' lunatic liberal ravings from Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters, among others especially in the Hollywood community that condemn on a daily basis anything that resembles America's ''civil'' society. Their condemnation is based on the belief that the Constitution is of no value any longer as it was written by white people that were salve holders.
It's nonsense to believe there's a difference between leftists and liberals. It's just a matter of degree.
The Latest Proof That the Left Opposes Western Civilization
Dennis Prager / @DennisPrager /
Last week, The Atlantic rendered a great service to those of us who contend that America is in the midst of a civil war between the right and the left. It provided a smoking gun—actually, the gunshot itself—to those of us who contend that the left (never to be confused with liberals) is intent on dismantling Western civilization.
It published articles by two left-wing writers, one by Peter Beinart titled “The Racial and Religious Paranoia of Trump’s Warsaw Speech,” and one by its national correspondent, James Fallows, written on the same theme as Beinart’s. The subject of both articles was President Donald Trump’s speech in Warsaw, Poland, last week, a speech described by The Wall Street Journal as “a determined and affirmative defense of the Western tradition.”
Yet, to The Atlantic writers, defending Western civilization is nothing more than a defense of white racism. Beinart begins his piece saying: “In his speech in Poland on Thursday, Donald Trump referred 10 times to ‘the West’ and five times to ‘our civilization.’ His white nationalist supporters will understand exactly what he means. It’s important that other Americans do, too.”
And Fallows begins saying, “what he called ‘civilization’ … boils down to ties of ethnicity and blood.” Is there one liberal or conservative American who thinks that the words “the West” and “Western civilization” mean a celebration of white-blood purity? I doubt it.
What we have here are two vital lessons. One is that leftism is the primary racist ideology of our time, seeing everything in terms of race, whereas mainstream liberalism and conservatism advocate a race-blind society as manifest in Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous “content of his character” line. The left disdains this view.
To cite one of innumerable examples, the University of California has published a list of biased “microaggression” statements students and faculty are to avoid. One of them is “There is only one race, the human race.” In other words, the left, which controls our universities, teaches American students that it is wrong to believe in one human race. That was precisely what the Nazis taught German students. And now, we have another expression of this doctrine enunciated in the pages of The Atlantic: that those who wish to protect or save Western civilization are talking about saving the white race.
I am certainly not equating leftism with Nazism. The left doesn’t seek to annihilate all Jews (it merely supports the Palestinians, who seek to annihilate the Jewish state).
I am merely stating an unassailable truth: No significant political movement since the Nazis has “honored” race or equated Western civilization with race, as Beinart and Fallows do.
The second service provided by The Atlantic writers is proof that the left loathes Western civilization and therefore has become the internal enemy of Western civilization both in America and Europe.
In the left’s eyes, the mere suggestion that Western civilization needs to be saved is, by definition, a call for the preservation of the white race. Therefore, the left opposes calls to save Western civilization. As Beinart wrote:
The most shocking sentence in Trump’s speech—perhaps the most shocking sentence in any presidential speech delivered on foreign soil in my lifetime—was his claim that ‘The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive.’ … Trump’s sentence only makes sense as a statement of racial and religious paranoia.Those of us who have long equated the left with opposition to Western civilization are vindicated.
We didn’t need Beinart and Fallows—we already had innumerable examples, such as the University of Pennsylvania English Department removing its longstanding poster of William Shakespeare because he was a white male—but in their explicit articulation of the left’s view, they are immensely helpful.
Shakespeare is read in every language that has an alphabet not because he was white or European but because he is regarded as the greatest playwright who ever lived. But the leftists who run that English Department place race (and gender) above excellence—a thorough rejection of Western values.
Ironically, outside of liberals and conservatives, those most likely to celebrate Western values are likely to not be Western.
The Japanese would scoff at the idea that Bach and Beethoven did not write the greatest music ever composed. That is why some of the greatest Bach recordings of our time come from Japanese musicians living in Japan. Nor would the Japanese deny that their modern country’s democratic values come from the West.
The West’s disdain for its own values seems to be getting increasingly strident with each passing day. Trump is making an important and laudable effort to reverse this trend. He’s walking in good company.
In an address to the Pan-American Scientific Congress in Washington, D.C., on May 10, 1940, then-President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, “Americans might have to become the guardian of Western culture, the protector of Christian civilization.” FDR frequently spoke about protecting both Western and Christian civilization.
We owe a debt of gratitude to The Atlantic, CNN (whose senior White House correspondent, Jeff Zeleny, described Trump’s address as a “white America, America first kind of speech”), and others.
They have made it clear that the left has contempt for Western civilization and therefore constitutes the greatest threat to its survival.
No comments:
Post a Comment